Related
Ryan Reynoldsspeaks out about the ongoingJustin Baldonilawsuit . Last year , Baldoni directedIt end With Us , a motion-picture show adaptation of the bestselling Colleen Hoover novel of the same name . For months , it was rumor that Baldoni and co - starBlake Lively(who , notably , is espouse to Reynolds ) were feuding on set . Neither player accost the issue head teacher - on until , months by and by , Lively sued Baldoni for sexual harassment , among other complaint . In reaction , Baldoni sue multiple groups , admit Lively .
PerDeadline , Reynolds and his squad have now attempted to dismiss one of Baldoni ’s lawsuits , slamming the actor - director for his statements . The legal team lay claim that Baldoni ’s lawsuits are establish on " wounded feelings " and " clickbait " lies . The squad fail on to break down the call that Reynolds called Baldoni a " predatory animal , " and whether that can be view defamation . The team notes"the FAC alleges no plausible facts that propose Mr. Reynolds did not believe this comment to be true . “Check out the school text from the memorandum of jurisprudence below :
The entirety of Plaintiffs ’ aspersion title appear to be based on two times that Mr. Reynolds allegedly called Mr. Baldoni a ‘ marauder . ' But , the FAC say no plausible facts that propose Mr. Reynolds did not believe this input to be true .
[ Baldoni ’s title is ] namely that Mr. Reynolds and an unnamed executive at WME had a conversation during a movie premiere about Mr. Reynolds ’ ‘ deep disdain for Baldoni , suggesting the agency was working with a ‘ sexual predator . '
The FAC does not say what precise condition Mr. Reynolds used in this alleged suggestion , the prison term in which he allegedly suggest it , or any information about the context of the conversations ( other than that one of them was about how much Mr. Reynolds dislikes him for having sexually harassed his married woman ) .
The Wayfarer Parties say that Mr. Reynolds gouge them , but fail to allege that he received any money or attribute . They exact he interfered with a contract without key what that contract is , what provisions were allegedly breached , or even which of them were parties to it . They assert $ 400 million in damages without explaining anything about who suffered that loss , in what balance , as a consequence of which claims , or what proximately caused such losses . The FAC is long on exaggeration , prose , and “ claims , ” but devoid of any facts necessary to state ones recognize by law . It is , in essence , a burn book filled with grievance attempting to attaint Mr. Reynolds for being the form of man who is ' confident enough to heed ' to the woman in his life and to go for her ‘ anguish and actually ’ stick out with her . '
The FAC is , in sum , a text retaliatory SLAPP lawsuit , and it should be dismissed with bias .
Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson , Reynolds ' lawyers , also say the following :
The entirety of Mr. Baldoni ’s case seems to be based on Mr. Reynolds allegedly in private calling Mr. Baldoni a ' predator , ’ but here is the trouble , that is not traducement unless they can show that Mr. Reynolds did not believe that financial statement to be true .
What This Means For The Baldoni Case
Baldoni’s Team Will Have Trouble Proving Defamation
Lively originally filed her sound complaint against Baldoni and his Wayfarer Studios on December 20 , 2024 . A daylight afterwards , The New York Timespublished an exposé entitle " We Can inhume Anyone : Instead a Hollywood Smear Machine,“which included details about the case . In chemical reaction , Baldoni sued theNew York Timesfor libel . But his legal action did not end there . In January of this year , Baldoni went on to register a $ 400 million lawsuit against Lively and Reynolds that claim civil extortion , invasion of privacy , and defamation .
The late movie adaptation of Colleen Hoover ’s It Ends with Us has viewers wondering what materialise to Lily and Atlas in the sequel , It Starts with Us .
As of now , a trial run is scheduled to lead off on March 9 , 2026 . Reynolds ' legal team ’s most late scheme involves understandably define " defamation " and noting how Reynolds ' actions do not fit into it . The lawyer noted intelligibly thatthis is " not defamation unless they can show that Mr. Reynolds did not conceive that statement to be true . "
Our Take On The Baldoni Case Update
Reynolds' Team Offers A Compelling Case
read the up-to-the-minute effectual update , it is hard to believe that Baldoni has a gravid chance of winning this case . While the United States courts can favor perpetrators over victims in sexual torment case , Reynolds ' team has proffer a compelling case for theDeadpoolactor , call Baldoni ’s claims " a burning book filled with grievance attempting to shame Mr. Reynolds for being the sort of military personnel who is ' confident enough to listen ' to the cleaning woman in his life and to hold her ‘ torment and in reality stand with her , ' " a financial statement that carries both emotional and sound weight .
rootage : Deadline
