Related
The much - malignedStar Warssequel trilogy turned out to be a fiasco for Disney , but how could the trilogy have been fixed ? Assuming the central character and major foundational plot of land points stay the same , there are several ways in which the sequels could have been improved . By analyzing the ways that theStar Warssequels disappointed , the same mistake can be obviate in the futurity .
Everyone has their own take on what the biggestStar Warssequel trilogy problemwas but , in realism , it was a combination of various problems that cause the movies to struggle . An immediate chemical reaction might be to fault J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson , however , it would not be bonny to find fault the entire trilogy ’s struggle on its directors , moot how neither had full creative ascendancy over their item-by-item movies . Instead , theStar Warssequel trilogy ’s misfortunate performance is a consequence of a host of misguided or misjudged determination .
link : All 6 Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Characters Who Must deliver
Did The Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Need To Be Better Planned?
Perhaps the most common criticism of theStar Warssequels is wretched long - terminus planning . This line fails to realize , however , that George Lucas had project much less than is widely believe when he begin work on theStar Warssaga . The idea ofDarth Vader being Luke Skywalker ’s fatherwas not add until the second gulp ofThe Empire Strikes Back . It seems , therefore , Lucas actually planned less of his originalStar Warstrilogy than Disney did with the sequel . accordingly , a deficiency of preparation does not seem theStar Warssequel trilogy ’s real issue , rather it was the incorrect matter that were planned .
Moreover , some of the concept planned by Disney could have been execute well . The overall lack of vision that theStar Warssequel trilogy struggled with breeds the popular assumption that it was under - project , but George Lucas prove extensive planning is not a requisite for a goodStar Warstrilogy . sure as shooting , recollective - condition cohesiveness was not starring in theStar Warssequels , but that is not the trilogy ’s main issuance , and many of the sequel ' authorship flaws actually come from how melodic theme were utilized , not how long they were in the pipeline .
The Force Awakens Depended Too Much On “Mystery Boxes”
The theme song J.J.Abrams mystery box storytellinginStar Wars : The Force Awakenswas a major issue with the sequel because it entrust the integral trilogy in a hard stead . The excess of mystery boxes inThe Force Awakens- Rey ’s stemma , Snoke ’s origins , etc . - squeeze Rian Johnson and Lucasfilm to pick out which mysteries to research and which unity to drop locomote forward . moreover , the hand forStar Wars : The Last Jediwas written beforeThe Force Awakenswas out , stand for Johnson and Lucasfilm did not have it away which mysteries had resonated most with the consultation .
Abrams ' mystery corner storytelling approach can be efficacious , but in theStar Warssequels , the filmy amount of running mysteries descend into a narrative lot . The trilogy ended up with mystery boxes that postulate opening as they became more vital to the plot of ground , such as the purpose andorigin of Supreme Leader Snoke . The Snoke secret must be explain at some point or else the interview will become frustrated and mislay interest in him . The job is that there was nothing in reality inside Snoke ’s mystery boxful .
relate : The Mandalorian Would Be Even advantageously Without The Sequel Trilogy
Snoke was a scoundrel without setting , and when Abrams was finally forced to give him some sort of origin inStar Wars : The ascending of Skywalker , the reveal feel half - cooked and unsatisfying - peculiarly because Snoke was already drained . The mystery story loge can work , but if it is used to craft every aspect of a narrative , like it was in Abrams ' twoStar Warsfilms , the story inevitably lacks deepness and meaning . TheStar Warssequels would have been better if there were less major secret for the audience to gravel over across several celluloid because the eventual reveals could then be much more substantial .
The Star Wars Sequels Should Have Been A Proper “Passing Of The Torch”
Thechallenge created by Luke Skywalkerand the other legacy characters inStar Wars ' continuation trilogy was that they hazard overshadowing the sequels ' original eccentric . Star Warsattempted to avoid that problem by changing these character , especially Luke , to make them less heroic . Furthermore , bringing back Palpatine inThe hike of SkywalkermeantStar Warsalso snap down the bequest of Luke and the other classic fictitious character to make way for the newcomers .
Star Warssimply bulldoze over the older reference and their accomplishment so that they would not block the newfangled characters . This was an super counterintuitive scheme because the whole point of bringing back the old characters was to withdraw upon their bequest - a legacy that the sequels essentially rendered meaningless . WithEmperor Palpatine live , it simply feel like nothing was truly accomplished in the original trilogy , which hurt both the original and sequelStar Warseras .
If Disney was intent on bring back the oldStar Warscharacters , which it probably always was , this should have been done with more of a " passing of the flashlight " access . Luke , Han , and Leia should have add up back to set everything up , perhaps train the newbies , and then should have been killed off in a meaningful way that solidified their legacy , not ruin it . That way , the classic 3 would have been leaving behind something literal for Rey and the others to carry on . Unfortunately , that is not the way theStar Warssequel trilogy played out , and the bequest of Luke and his friends was seriously tarnish .
come to : Star Wars ' Sequel Trilogy Can regain Prequel - Style Redemption - But When ?
Palpatine’s Resurrection Needed To Be Better Signposted (If It Happened)
The concluding issue , and perhaps the most severe , is that theresurrection of Emperor Palpatineand his good continuation as the mainantagonist is not presage at all inStar war : The Force AwakensandThe Last Jedi . Palpatine ’s takings comes from nowhere , and the reveal that he is the puppet master behind Snoke , and almost everything else in the trilogy , comes off as faineant . If Disney wanted to bring back Palpatine in a meaningful way , it should have been laying breadcrumb throughout the first two movies . That direction , the big Palpatine reveal would have connect the dots and clicked . or else , it felt like Disney ran out of ideas .
The other alternative would be to keep off work the Emperor back altogether . Had Disney stick withSupreme Leader Snokeas the main baddie of theStar Warssequel trilogy , it could have developed him into an occupy new enemy with an original backstory and story purpose . Instead , he turn out to be an undistinguished creation of Palpatine ’s with an underwhelming and premature death . It seems potential that theStar Warssequels would have been much well receive if there was a all the way - cut down villain with a fully flesh out story from the starting time . The presence of a more meaningful opponent would have improved theStar Warssequels substantially .
More : Andy Serkis ' Star Wars Return Trick Can posit Other Sequel Trilogy Mistakes
